Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Valentine’s Day: Red Sox set to unleash Bobby Valentine 2.0 on MLB


Bobby Valentine is set to become the 45th manager in Red Sox history sometime around midday local time in Boston today. Valentine is on his way back from Japan where sources are saying he was offered the job. All that remains now is the goofy opening press conference with Valentine sporting that classy old Boston cap.

This column is going to come right out and say it, we like the move. Valentine is a long term, old school baseball guy. He gets the game and sees things other don’t. He has experienced almost everything in the game. He got to the big leagues briefly at age 19 in 1969 and then returned two years later. He played in the big leagues for 10 years total, spread out across five teams. He was the No. 1 pick of the Dodgers in 1968, taken ahead of none other than Bill Buckner (nice symmetry there!).

Two things stand out really, above and beyond the clichéd ‘he will bring discipline’ angle being regurgitated incessantly around the major sporting online outlets today.

First off, he brings a tremendous amount of colour and character to the Manager’s office. You can envision Valentine garnering more than his share of headlines, and one thing that will do is deflect attention away from his players. This will be a welcome distraction after a carpet bombing of paparazzi treatment this batch of Red Sox players may never forget (things figure to be pretty icy between certain reports and the players they covered with gleeful Schadenfreude during the great September swoon).

Secondly, we think we all need to ensure everyone knows about this, what is really undoubtedly one of the funniest moments in MLB history

In June 9, 1999 during the 12th inning of a 14 inning marathon with the Toronto Blue Jays, Mike Piazza was called for catcher's interference on Craig Grebeck. Valentine was ejected by home plate umpire Randy Marsh for arguing the call, and, well, then this happened.



Assuming MLB eventually take that video above down, Valentine unbelievably returned to the dugout an inning later in a disguise Ron Burgundy would be proud of. One of the funniest baseball moments ever. Sadly MLB didn’t get the joke and fined Valentine $5,000 and suspended him for three games.

Hey, how is this guy not going to fit in to the Cirque De Red Sox?!



Linkage

Sunday, November 27, 2011

NFL picks: Week twelve: Breathing a sigh of relief


So can I gloat that I had Stanford -6.5? Can we throw that in there to boost stats? Notre Dame, that's Karma at the door. Anyway, after a hot .700 start this column was depressed to come back down to earth with a bang, however this column then breathed a hefty sigh of relief after surveying the surrounding professional scribes picks percentages. Have you seen them? We're talking often below .500. One in particular that I know a lot of readers of this column subscribe to, he's two under .500. Anyway, sometimes it's nice to know you are hovering slightly above average. In fact, most of the time actually, when you think about it. Slightly above average is the place to be.

Enough with the chit chat. Some NFL post-thanksgiving quick picks.


Previous weeks
Running total - 76-70 ATS
Week by week links at foot of column

Essential NFL pick links


Minnesota Vikings (2-8) at Atlanta Falcons (6-4) -9.5
No Adrian Peterson? No chance.
The score: Minnesota 20 Atlanta 33
The pick: Atlanta -9.5

Buffalo Bills (5-5) at New York Jets (5-5) -8.5
No Fred Jackson? No chance! (There's a theme developing here!)
The score: Buffalo 17 New York 30
The pick: New York -8.5

Cleveland Browns (4-6) at Cincinnati Bengals (6-4) -7.5
No players with any discernible talent? No chance!
The score: Cleveland 13 Cincinnati 24
The pick: Cincinnati -7.5

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-6) at Tennessee Titans (5-5) -3.5
No Hasselback? No chance! (Disclaimer: Obviously adjust accordingly if Hasselback is playing!)
The score: Tampa 20 Tennessee 23
The pick: Tampa +3.5

Carolina Panthers (2-8) at Indianapolis Colts (0-10) +3.5
No wins? No chance!
The score: Carolina 28 Indianapolis 13
The pick: Carolina -3.5

Arizona Cardinals (3-7) at St. Louis Rams (2-8) -3.5
No point in watching other than Steven Jackson!
The score: Arizona 23 St Louis 28
The pick: St Louis -3.5

Houston Texans (7-3) at Jacksonville Jaguars (3-7) +3.5
No Schuab? No problem!
The score: Houston 24 Jacksonville 17
The pick: Houston -3.5

Chicago Bears (7-3) at Oakland Raiders (6-4) -4.5
No Cutler? Well, definitely a problem, but that Chicago D can overwhelm Oakland.
The score: Chicago 20 Oakland 17
The pick: Chicago +4.5

Washington Redskins (3-7) at Seattle Seahawks (4-6) -4.5
No believers in Seattle. No reason to pick Washington.
The score: Washington 17 Seattle 24
The pick: Seattle -4.5

Denver Broncos (5-5) at San Diego Chargers (4-6) -6.5
No San Diego throw-back, this aint' your Daddy's Chargers. Plus, Tebow is the second coming. Of Randall Cunningham.
The score: Denver 28 San Diego 26
The pick: Denver +6.5

New England Patriots (7-3) at Philadelphia Eagles (4-6) +3
No Vick? No dream-team.
The score: New England 34 Philly 23
The pick: New England -3

Pittsburgh Steelers (7-3) at Kansas City Chiefs (4-6) +10.5
No reasoning behind this pick other than it feels like too many points.
The score: Pittsburgh 26 Kansas 20
The pick: Kansas +10.5

New York Giants (6-4) at New Orleans Saints (7-3) -6.5
No, that's not the good Manning.
The score: New York 20 New Orleans 30
The pick: New Orleans -6.5




Previous weeks
Week one - 11-4Week two - 12-4
Week three - 6-10
Week four - 10-6
Week five - 7-6
Week six - 4-9
Week seven 6-7
Week eight - 7-6
Week nine - 5-9
Week ten - 7-7
Week eleven thus far - 1-2

Linkage

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Happy Turkey day, baby. He hate me (plus now with added NFL Turkey day picks)!


Normally on this date annually Boston Irish prints its annual Buzzkill piece on how the only real Americans were the victims of Genocide over the last few hundred years, and you should all feel guilty (yes, including me) for watching the Lions shock the Packers 36-30 (you heard it here first!) when no one is acknowledging the plain and simple fact that a massive genocide was perpetrated over the course of four hundred years.

Fun times for all!

Previous Buzzkill Thanksgiving entries;
2008
2007


Naturally, people really don’t much care for that, and the torrents of abuse are always plentiful, varied and vitriolic.

This year, Boston Irish doesn't have the energy for the inevitable abuse, so will be just saying 'Happy Thanksgiving', eating some delicious home made pumpkin pie and enjoying the football in the best possible company.

You know what is amazing though? The sheer level of hatred and anger out there in the vast cluster-fudge that is the Internet. It’s not just the Turkey day piece. No way, José. Sports, believe it or not, is an incredibly divisive subject. Shocker, I know. I would chance a guess that of all the e-mail Boston Irish has drawn since its inception in 2006, the vast majority has been argumentative, hateful anti-fan mail. Not sure what that says about the content of this blog, maybe it's a comment on that, or maybe it is a comment on the spiteful nature of the Net of Inter.

Hey, let’s have a look at the highlights, why not, in the spirit of Genocide day. Right after some Turkey Day NFL quick picks.

Green Bay @ Detroit +6
It is very hard to go 16-0 in the NFL season. It is even harder to go 19-0. Just ask any Patriots fan. Ask them when they wake up on a beach in Mexico after getting thrown out of a theater for shouting at Dallas fans who were rooting for the Giants (What?! Really?! But they are both in the NFC East?! Right, I know!). Either which way, Detroit to shock the world.
The score: Green Bay 30 Detroit 36
The Pick: Detroit +6

Miami @ Dallas -7
Would the real Dallas please stand up?! Miami playing with momentum that seemed highly unlikely a month ago. Go with the hot hand (and the points). Dallas hasn't beaten anyone decent since they got hammered by the Eagles. Their three game winning streak is a paper tiger.
The score: Miami 24 Dallas 23
The Pick: Miami +7

San Francisco @ Baltimore -3.5
Is there still room on the 49ers bandwagon?
The score: San Francisco 24 Baltimore 20
The Pick: San Francisco +3.5


Death threats
Naturally top of the bill was a death threat, that came in late 2007. It had to be the most poorly thought out death threat of all time. It was anonymous, poorly spelt and quite unspecific in nature. It took me a while to figure out why the e-mailer was so angry. Goodness me though, it was expletive laden and very hateful. The funny thing was, it was so poorly spelt it never really got under my skin. It was almost as if an angry Orangutan had taken the time and spent the effort to become proficient in typing but slacked off on the whole spelling side of things. Still, you haven’t lived unless you have had at least one death threat in your life, so, we can check that box off at least.

Jets fans
Oh those poor little Jets fans. They get so wound up, angry and frustrated. In many, many ways, Rex Ryan is the perfect coach for the J-E-T-S, as he mirrors much of their fan base. Fat, unruly, seemingly pretty uneducated (I feel like I can write that, having received poorly written death threats from their fan-base), Ryan has been blazing a trail of trash-talking glory throughout his tenure with the Jets, all with very little impact on the standings in the AFC East. The Jets had their day in the sun when they won 'their Superbowl' (as they called it) and are now reduced to side notes with a generally humorous slant. Rex Ryan crying in the locker room. Rex Ryan eating twelve cheeseburgers at one sitting. Rex Ryan's foot fetish. Rex Ryan’s pants ripping during a team meeting. The Jets, their coach and their fans are a side-note in ’11, and goodness me, their fan base is angry. Boston Irish has received a slew of poorly written, hard to decipher ‘hate mail’ from Jets fans over the years, none more so than in ’11. The following three emails are from angry little Jets fans, all received in the last three years, all from different IP addresses.


Now that's a beer belly

Subject: ‘You can **** off and die in hell’.
Highlights: ‘You think you are all that patriots fans but yu (sic) are not all that patriots suck jets rule JETS JETS’

I like to picture someone from Holland saying the above, in a really bad Euro-English accent. Try it, it’s fun.

Subject: ‘The Patriots suck and so do you’
Highlights: ‘Mark MY words the Patriots WILL get beaten by the Jets in round two and the Patriots WILL finish behind the Jets. Tom Brady can watch while Mark Sanchez leads the Jets to the Superbowl just like Brady did the Patriots in 01’

Jets fans seem to really like the word ‘suck’. Is there some deep underlying meaning behind this? Sadly this fan WAS wrong ABOUT the GAME last SUNDAY (Capitals rule!).

Subject: ‘Why do you bother?’
Highlights: ‘In five years time Mark Sanchez will be on the cover of every magazine and Tom Brady will be a nobody’

Odd one this, unsure as to why this Jets fan took the time to send me this email, was this scary premonition meant to upset me in some shape or form? You know, the Internet is such a crazy place really, it’s funny to think someone took the time to sit down and write a long, boring (believe me, the above was the only interesting part) email to someone they don’t know based on an amateur article on sports.

Then again, that’s the entire reason we keep this blog, communication, therefore you have to reason you take the bad with the good. Plus, those Jets fans are kind of funny in an angry-ant kind of way. Quite angry, but essentially harmless.

NASCAR fans
For people that spend an inordinate amount of time watching cars go round and round in circles, NASCAR fans can sure generate volumes of angry emails. Tip to all aspiring writers, don’t ever take on NASCAR, the retribution will be massive, aggressive and very, very poorly spelt.

Yankees fans
You would think, with the heavily Boston slanted content of this blog, the majority of abuse would emanate from the keyboard of Yankee fans. Far from it. There has been much more e-mail from those angry little Jets fans over the years. Instead, there have been basically two Yankee fans who launched long propaganda campaigns over the course of weeks, starting out aggressive, angry and bitter, eventually becoming dull and boring. Snap judgment, from a small cross-section, Yankees fans appear much better at basic manipulation of the English language than, for example, Jets fans. Is this a thinly veiled comment on New Jersey and it’s populace?

Of course, no Yankee fan will ever be as angry as this guy.



English people
Saving the best for last. You really never know you have been verbally abused by an English person until about seven hours after it actually happens. You know that Simpsons where Homer meets Ricky Gervais, and he listens to him waffle on for ages before finally exclaiming, ‘You take FOREVER to say NOTHING!’ People who read this, I give you English people! Taking a step back, where do all these angry English e-mails come from? Simple. My father, brother and I have always taken great pleasure in the demise of any English sports team. Soccer, cricket, Rugby or whatever, it doesn’t matter. It is funny when England loses. It’s funny when the English cricket team loses to a minor cricket nation and the English press screams headlines akin to ‘England’s failures may be because they are hopeless’. It is funny when England get knocked out of the World Cup.


Why is it so funny? That’s simple. If you lived in Ireland in the 80s you were suffocated by British sports on TV. The Charlton and golden Irish rugby eras had yet to begin, and Sky Sports was just a pipe dream. Instead we had to suffer arrogant British sports commentators on the BBC or UTV. You know the drill, a British athlete in a 20 person field in a track event? Even if the British athlete finished fifth, theirs is the name you would hear most. Soccer? Don’t even get me started. British sports pundits, who we had rammed down our throats for decades before the sports media explosion, were always convinced they would win whatever tournament they were playing in.

So it is easy to see why any British sporting demise is greeted with glee in my family household.

Thing is, they don’t take it very well, the Brits. Cue reams, stacks, truck-loads of angry emails whenever Boston Irish says anything bad about the UK.

Well, chin up, limey. Just wait until the European Championships next year! We can have a good go at each other then.

In the meantime, Happy Thanksgiving, peace and love to all.




''In the 1910, the total population of North American Indians was about 400,000, down from about 18 -19 million in 1492.''

(David Stannard in his 'American Holocaust', 1992, pp. 74-75, p.151)




Linkage

Revisiting something in a timely manner: hy·poc·ri·sy, I dub thee George King

Wrote this way back when on Thanksgiving in 2006 (do you remember 2006?! It seems like a different life at this stage). Interesting to re-visit it in the light of Justin Verlander taking the MVP trophy for the pitchers fraternity.



hy·poc·ri·sy, I dub thee George King

hy·poc·ri·sy
1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

Oh, how they wept! The New York Post and it's baseball columnists have had an interesting week. The slant of their articles has gone from 'Jeter deserves the MVP' to 'Uh oh, maybe he's not going to win it' all the way to 'How dare the writers choose someone other than Derek!!'

The first hint that something was amiss in the City that never sleeps was from this article by the NY Posts George King, where he came out with this paranoid-aggressive paragraph;

One area that shouldn't be ignored is anti-Yankee and anti-New York bias. If you don't think they exist, look no further than the NL Manager of the Year Award, won by former Florida manager Joe Girardi over Mets manager Willie Randolph.

Where does one even start with that infantile little outburst. Is he for real? An anti New York bias? To belittle the job that Joe Girardi did with a Marlins team that some thought might win maybe 50 games in '06 as nothing but 'anti New York bias' is absolutely asinine.

Here's the thing, it all comes back neatly to George King himself.

In 1999 Pedro Martinez put up one of the all time great season by a pitcher. He went an astounding 23-4 with a 2.07 ERA and 313 strikeouts, incredible numbers. He blew the NL away in his sensational All Star game start and walked into Yankee Stadium on September 10th and struck out 17 Yankees leading the Red Sox to a 3-1 win. It was, arguably, the greatest single season by a pitcher, certainly in living memory.

Pedro Martinez

That seasons MVP vote was controversial, as Martínez received the most first-place votes (8 of 28), but was totally omitted from the ballot of two sportswriters who believed pitchers were not sufficiently all-around players to be considered. Pedro Martínez finished second to Texas Rangers catcher Ivan Rodriguez, 252 points to 239. Rodríguez had been included on all 28 ballots.

The men in question were LaVelles Neal of the Minneapolis's Star-Tribune and George King of the New York Post.

They both argued, King more vehemently, that pitchers should not be eligible for the award. According to wikipedia though,

''On occasion, though, pitchers still win the award, and the current rules for the MVP specifically state that pitchers are to be considered. Since 1971, however, only four pitchers have won the award, the last being Dennis Eckersley in 1992.''

King and LaVellespan's slight caused outrage amongst the baseball community, and not just Boston's passionate fans. "It really made (writers) all look very dumb," said Buster Olney, who covers the Yankees for the New York Times. "people were operating under different rules. The question of eligibility is a very basic thing. People were determining eligibility for themselves."

The real shocker is,
George King has previously voted for Mariano Rivera on multiple occasions, in previous years. If you look Mariano up online it would appear the young man is a pitcher.

How dare George King complain about how other voters cast their votes. Who does he think he is to cast doubt on the decisions of other baseball writers when given the chance, he showed to be a royal hypocrite by ruining Pedro Martinez's MVP chase by not having him on the ballot at all whilst previously voting for other pitchers.

In McCarthy like fashion King has now arrogantly come out and 'outed' various writers for not having Jeter higher on their own ballot, ridiculing them and even going as far as to say ''This isn't the first time Cowley has been in the eye of an MVP controversy.''

Well George, you certainly know a thing about controversy. Now you also know a thing or two about Karma.

Instead of casting doubt on other journalists, how about you explain to us all your exclusion of Pedro in '99 saying it was because he was a pitcher while you had no problem voting for Mariano. Anti NY bias indeed!

If you feel like asking George why he is wobbling around slating other journalists MVP votes when he practically invented the term 'MVP controversy' then send him an e-mail!

I am delighted Justin Morneau won the MVP award, the young lad clearly deserved at least a shot at it after posting a sparkling season.

People like George King have agendas and bitterness lurking behind their reasoning. His leaving Pedro off the ballot in '99 was an ugly, clearly hypocritical gesture by an arrogant man. Thankfully he did nothing to diminish the memory of Petey's spectacular season. I sincerely hope The diminutive Dominicans dandy performance in walking into Yankee stadium and embarrassing the Yankees on sept 10th 1999 sticks in King's throat like an off slice of week old turkey for the rest of his life.

Happy Thanksgiving and congratulations Justin Morneau.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I demand a recount! Pedro Martinez was robbed of the 1999 MVP award


So does anyone know what the hypocritical, pedantic, stubborn clown George King is up to? A cursory glance through the Net of Inter reveals not much in the way of information on the presumably former NY Post ‘writer’. He doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page. Those with reasonably long memories will recall George King was the idiot who left Pedro Martinez completely off his MVP voting card in 1999, costing Pedro the award, despite a transcendent year that makes Justin Verlander’s 2011 season look like the back of John Wasdin’s baseball card.


Pedro tearing apart the Yankees in the '99 ALCS

Naturally, there had to be a ‘George King’ in 20011 too. Let’s hope Jim Ingraham’s career turns out better than Mr. Kings. Verlander appeared on 27 of 28 ballots and was omitted by Ingraham of The Herald-News in Ohio, who voted Bautista first.. At least Ingraham tried to give an explanation for his omission.

"I'd wrestled with this for a long time. If I was ever going to vote for pitcher for MVP, it would be him this year, he hasn't appeared in 79 percent of their games, any starting pitcher really doesn't appear in 79 percent of his team's games in a year.''


Ingraham has obviously never tried getting a batter out in his life. Those Muppets bleating that no pitcher should win the MVP award as they only play every fifth day, have probably never pitched in a competitive game in their life. I have some insight on this, having thrown over 1,400 innings in the Irish baseball league and in European competition. That’s fifteen levels in terms of quality below the Majors, approximately, however the effect on my arm is the same. Positional players, by and large, don’t lay in bed at night putting weight on their arm to stop it hurting. They don’t go to bed after a particularly taxing game on a cocktail of painkillers. They do not, by and large, go through anything like the physical strain and pressure the average starting pitcher goes through. They do not risk their arm every time they take the hill. Coming out with that tired old stale cliché merely means you know nothing of what a person gives physically to be a starting pitcher.

What hurts most of all is when you look at Justin and Pedro’s statistics, the Dominican Dandy puts Verlander in the (mango tree) shade. In 1999, in the middle of the juicing era, Martinez had a completely insane 2.07 ERA. For 2011 Verlander submitted a very respectable 2.40. Martinez struck out 313 batters, or 13.2 per nine innings pitched. Verlander struck out 250 batters, or 9.0 per nine innings pitched. Simply no comparison. Martinez walked just 37 batters, for a strikeout-to-walk ratio of 8.46. Verlander walked 57 batters, for a 4.39 strikeout-to-walk ratio.

Even the most casual of fan would surely agree, Martinez has superior numbers, just no award. Incredibly Martinez was even better the following year in 2000, when he went 18-6 with a 1.74 ERA, however in a mind-boggling turn of events, he came in fifth that year. Go figure.

This isn’t about the validity of a pitcher being as valuable as an ‘every-day player’, this isn’t about anything other than some stubborn idiot leaving Pedro completely off the ballot in 1999, spoiling an absolutely wonderful season that fully deserved the MVP. This has been hammered home by Verlander taking home the 2011 award, and putting an exclamation point to the end of the sentence that reads; ‘George King is an idiot, and always will be!’

Let none of this take away from Verlander, and his superb 2011 season. Congratulations Justin. Pedro, we will never forget your sensational, scintillating, sexy 1999 season. It deserved better.





Linkage

The NFL cares, FIFA doesn’t: Rex Ryan facing hefty fine while FIFA basically ignores rampant racism in its sport


Interesting incidents across two diverse sports this week. In the NFL, noted fat-mouth Rex Ryan verbally abused a fan at a game with a torrent of expletives that would have made Chuck Norris blush. Meanwhile, FIFA basically slapped the Bulgarian football federations hands after their fans were found guilty of racially abusing several English players during September's Euro 2012 qualifier in Sofia.

Really fascinating to see how the two sports have handled their issues. One, professionally and sternly, the other, well, basically they haven’t handled it at all. No prizes for guessing which is which.

The NFL is going to announce the actual fine today however Sexy Rexy is expected to be going to be $100,000 lighter in his wallet region after they are done with him. This is after he used ‘profane language’ in a split second reaction to a fan at last Sunday night's game against the New England Patriots. This comes hot on the heels after the Jets fined Ryan when he made an obscene gesture to fans at a mixed martial arts event in Miami during Super Bowl week in 2010 ($50,000 that time).

So, let’s get this totally straight in our heads before we move on to the wonderful world of FIFA. The New York Jets head coach is going to be $150,000 worse off by the end of this week for two relatively minor incidents. The message? The NFL and its franchises will not tolerate any kind of tarnish to their glossy coats.

Now, on to FIFA.

During the afore mentioned match, Bulgarian ‘fans’ showered English players with racist chants, targeting England’s black players with bananas, monkey chants and also, somewhat bizarrely, the Nazi salute (is Hitler big in Bulgaria?!).

You stay classy, Bulgaria!

Imagine for a second that happening during the Chiefs v Patriots encounter tonight in New England. Just imagine for one second a section of Kansas fans showering a player or players on the Patriots sidelines with racist chants, bananas and the Nazi salute. I mean, can you imagine the reaction? There is no doubt in my mind the ramifications would be enormous. They are pepper spraying and ‘tazing’ peaceful protesters in the streets, so one would imagine the riot police would have a field day in this imaginary incidence.

Back to FIFA. With the above in mind, FIFA’s reaction to the disgusting behaviour of those Bulgarian fans? They fined the Bulgarian Football Union £34,250.

I suppose you have to pick your jaw up off the floor and remember, this is the same organization that basically ignored the incredible riot performed by Serbian fans earlier this year. This is the organization whose head (The second most corrupt man in the world, Sepp Blatter, losing out narrowly to Vladimir ‘The money was just resting in my account’ Putin) thinks racism on the pitch is not an issue and can be settled with a handshake.

FIFA is absolutely littered with situations where issues stinking of racism have been basically kicked under the carpet. In 2004 the former Spanish international team manager, the despicable Luis Aragonés, called Thierry Henry a ‘’black shit’’. FIFA fined him £2,060. In 2004 FIFA fined Spain (Yes, Spain, again) £44,750 after Spanish fans racially abused English players during a game in Madrid. In 2007 the Serbian Football Federation was fined £16,500 by Uefa (FIFA’s European arm) for "the racist chanting of supporters and the improper conduct of their players" during an under-21 match against England. In 2008 Croatia were fined £10,000 for "displaying a racist banner and showing racist conduct" during their country's Euro 2008 quarter-final against Turkey. In 2008 FIFA again docked Croatia some cash, this time £15,000 after England's Emile Heskey was subjected to racial abuse by home fans during the 4-1 victory in a qualifier for the 2010 World Cup against Croatia in Zagreb.

Add those fines up, all leveled against serious instances of racial abuse (far worse in this columns book than an expletive or two) and you get £88,310. That equates to $136,000.

You can probably see where we are going with this.

Seven long years of horrific racially charged incidents have led FIFA to fine the protagonists $136,000. Two quick outbursts of profanity from Rex Ryan and the NFL has fined him $150,000.

I guess we can see which sport is professional, stern, and determined to do things the right way. And which sport is presided over by FIFA.




Linkage

Friday, November 18, 2011

NFL picks: Week eleven: Tebow for Canton! Let's rush to judgement.


So shall we just ignore due process and go ahead and enshrine Little Timmy Tebow in Canton now? We may as well, right? I mean, he has won three games in a row! Get that guy his bust already! Who cares if he has a lower QB rating than Ryan Leaf ever managed?! Who cares if the Denver wide-receivers are about to revolt?! Who cares if Tebow led one good drive against the Jets last night?! In his three game winning streak Tebow and his mates have beaten Oakland, Kansas and the Jets of New York. Consider that McFadden was out for Oakland, pretty much everyone was out for Kansas, and the Jets were playing without a running back or anything resembling an NFL QB. The one game Tebow played against a decent NFL squad, he was crushed 10-45 by the Lions.

A bit of sanity amongst the wildly hyperbolic morning headlines would be nice. However, one muses we shall be waiting a while before this ridiculous fad wears out.

Thankfully we have plenty of quality NFL games coming this weekend, with, you know, teams that actually matter (Harsh? Let’s see how Tebow and his pals do against the Chargers, Patriots, Chicago and Buffalo).

Previous weeks
Running total - 75-68 ATS
Week by week links at foot of column

Essential NFL pick links



More column inches than passing yards

Week eleven Buffalo Bills (5-4) at Miami Dolphins (2-7) -2.5
The Bills have had two tough weeks against two tough teams, the Jets and Cowboys. Miami has feasted at the table of plenty against Kansas and Washington. This week we see a market correction.
The score: Buffalo 28 Miami 24
The pick: Buffalo +2.5

Cincinnati Bengals (6-3) at Baltimore Ravens (6-3) -7.5
Hey let's not puke all over the Bengals season just yet. Remember, before a pretty close, well contested loss to the Steelers, The Bungles were riding a tasty five game win streak. This is too many points for a wildly inconsistent Ravens to give up.
The score: Cincinnati 24 Baltimore 27
The pick: Cincinnati +7.5

Jacksonville Jaguars (3-6) at Cleveland Browns (3-6) +0.5
Hey check this out. The worst passing team in the NFL (The Jaguars rank 32nd) against the worst passing defence in the NFL (Cleveland rank 1st in passing yards allowed)! The Jaguars have two decent wins in their last three. The Brownies? They aint got much in their last anything.Link
The score: Jacksonville 20 Cleveland 13
The Pick: Jacksonville -0.5

Dallas Cowboys (5-4) at Washington Redskins (3-6) +7.5
Dallas is riding a wave of momentum. The Redskins are riding a wave of mutilation.
The score: Dallas 34 Washington 17
The pick: Dallas -7.5

Carolina Panthers (2-7) at Detroit Lions (6-3) -6.5
Everyone seems to have figured Carolina out. The Lions beat themselves last week against the Bears. The Lions, at home, with their bad week out of the way, to right the ship.
The score: Carolina 20 Detroit 30
The pick: Detroit -6.5

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-5) at Green Bay Packers (9-0) -14.5
Are you going to argue with this one? I'm not. Green Bay at home against a team spiraling downwards.
The score: Tampa 17 Green Bay 34
The pick: Green Bay -14.5

Oakland Raiders (5-4) at Minnesota Vikings (2-7) -1.5
The Raiders have enough to handle the Vikings, who are basically in re-building mode.
The score: Oakland 24 Minnesota 20
The Pick: Oakland -1.5

Seattle Seahawks (3-6) at St. Louis Rams (2-7) -2.5
In case nobody has noticed, St Louis are starting to put their pieces back together. Don't read too much into the Hawks win against the Ravens, Seattle are a better team at home.
The score: St Louis 28 Seattle 20
The pick: St Louis -2.5

Arizona Cardinals (3-6) at San Francisco 49ers (8-1) -9.5
San Francisco are not built to blow teams out. Arizona can keep this relatively close. The 'Cards are riding a nice two game winning streak and can easily stay within 10 points against the 49ers. I am not drinking the Kool aid, I can't wait to bet against Alex Smith in the playoffs.
The score: Arizona 25 San Francisco 27
The pick: Arizona +9.5

Tennessee Titans (5-4) at Atlanta Falcons (5-4) -6.5
The Falcons, at home, need this one, and probably have too much talent for the Titans. Isn't it odd to see the Titans ranked dead last, 32nd , rushing the pigskin? The Titans are competitive however, and those are too many points for a nervous Falcons team.
The score: Tennessee 20 Atlanta 24
The pick: Tennessee +6.5

San Diego Chargers (4-5) at Chicago Bears (6-3) -3.5
That line is so low based on the previous reputation of the Chargers and that alone. This Bears 'D' is legitimate and is frothing at the mouth waiting to pounce on a few of Philip Rivers' lame duck floating passes. In his defense, he has two seconds to chuck-and-duck, that offensive line of the Chargers is awful. Watch for a Bears defensive touchdown at some point in this one.
The score: San Diego 20 Chicago 34
The pick: Chicago -3.5

Philadelphia Eagles (3-6) at New York Giants (6-3) -3.5
So how is that Eagles superbowl pick working out for everyone that went in that direction? Have you seen the Eagles run-in? Patriots, Jets and Cowboys. Nasty. Their season is over, and they know it. Vick gets knocked out early and the Eagles can't keep up, as the Giants smell blood in the water.
The score: Philadelphia 17 New York 30
The pick: New York -3.5

Kansas City Chiefs (4-5) at New England Patriots (6-3) -14.5
Who is Kansas going to suit up for this one? Losing to Miami and Denver is nothing short of putrid. The Patriots can do whatever they want in this one
The score: New England 38 Kansas 13
The pick: New England -14.5



Previous weeks
Week one - 11-4
Week two - 12-4
Week three - 6-10
Week four - 10-6
Week five - 7-6
Week six - 4-9
Week seven 6-7
Week eight - 7-6
Week nine - 5-9
Week ten - 7-7

Linkage

Monday, November 14, 2011

About last night: Thoughts on Patriots 37 Jets 16


Has Rex Ryan released any bombastic announcements as yet today? His Jets still going to win the Superbowl? (Is there a greater boy-who-cried-wolf in NFL history, ‘’We’re going to win the Superbowl!’’ – sure Rex, sure)

Some aspects of last night’s encounter between the Patriots and the Jets in the Meadowlands stood out.

Act like you have been here before
Commentator Chris Collinsworth made a very revealing comment about his view from the training grounds of both squads. Having visited both mid week, Chris noted that the Jets were running very up-tempo practices. There was a lot of high energy chest-thumping and a lot of focus on the Patriots. He noted on the flip side that at the Patriots training sessions, you couldn’t tell if they had won or lost the week before. It was just business as usual.

Communication is the name of the game
Did you see how active and communicative the Patriots ‘D’ was? Vince Wilfork was extremely vocal and led by example, as always. It seemed like everyone knew exactly where they had to be. A backfield of relatively no-name players played fantastic coverage all night, a direct result of super communication between team-mates.



Bully me? I’ll bully you!
The Jets love to ‘throw shapes’, they love their swagger, trash talking and posturing. More often than not, when push comes to shove, they melt into air. In the third quarter Brady misfired on a short ‘out’ to Aaron Hernandez. The Jets DB on the play (Wilson?) took a cheap shot at the big New England TE, right in front of the side judge. The reason no flag was thrown was that the Jets DB bounced right back off Hernandez, the latter turning to him, and shouting niceties at him, as the Jets DB quickly cowered back to his mates. The Patriots were bigger, meaner and stronger on the night, they just didn’t shout about it as much.

Brady the party planner
Brady was at his organizational best last night, constantly tweaking his troops into position to make the right plays. His fourth quarter no-huddle work was nothing short of sensational, however all night long he was constantly managing the game, motioning WRs into position, shouting out coverages to his offensive line. Brady must have been absolutely exhausted both mentally and physically after this one.

Lay off Sanchez
Say what you want about Jets QB Mark Sanchez, and no doubt plenty of people will, he did not come up with that decrepit game plan. The Jets are not a passing team. They know it, we know it, everybody knows it. However, they almost completely gave up on the run last night, slinging the ball around like a college spread offence. They did not look themselves. Blame Mark Sanchez if you like, however I point the finger at the Jets coaching staff, once more over-thinking themselves out of a big game.

Game changers
The game hinged on two key fumbles. One that didn’t happen and one that did. How often do you see a QB go up against several defensive linemen and come out with the ball (and, physically intact)? The mis-snap between center and Brady early in the game at the Patriots line could have been devastating. Brady dove down and amazingly came out of the pile with the rock. Absolutely unbelievable play. Then, with the game completely balanced and at a point where it could have gone either way, the Patriots special teams came up with that massive fumble recovery off a Patriots punt. From that point on it was all Patriots.




Act like you have been here before II
Patriots defensive lineman Andre Carter was nothing short of sensational last night, with four thunderous solo sacks. Fascinatingly, on the last two, with the Jets driving and desperately trying to claw back into the game, Carter sacked Sanchez, stood up, and jogged back into position. Ray Lewis would still be celebrating those final two sacks. Carter led by example and put his team ahead of personal celebration. I wonder did the Jets learn anything from that?




Linkage

Saturday, November 12, 2011

NFL Picks: Week Ten: Picking for your freedoms


Week ten, who would have thought it? Well into the 'business end' of the NFL season now, aren't we? Today's thought, on 'Veterans weekend', isn't it funny how, living in Dublin, Ireland, I can walk into a bookmaker and place a bet, whilst if you are reading this in Boston, Boise or Brooklyn, you can't. You have to have 'a guy', for that. Doesn't it make you wonder, every time an NFL broadcaster slams the whole 'fighting for your freedoms' cliché down your throat on Sunday night, exactly what freedoms are we talking about here?

Because some politician took hundreds of thousands of dollars from land based Vegas Casinos, and subsequently sneakily forced a bill through banning Internet and sports gambling, because of that the average hard working American has to go to illegal bookmakers to place their NFL bets this weekend, and that's freedom? Really?

It is all so frustrating, we may as well all just be Tebowing.


Previous weeks
Running total - 68-61 ATS
Week by week links at foot of column

Essential NFL pick links


Week ten New Orleans Saints (6-3) at Atlanta Falcons (5-3) +0.5
The game: The only reason this spread is close is the Falcons are home. The Saints are a more explosive team in all areas. Darren Sproles has been a key to the Saints and the Chargers seasons. His arrival in New Orleans has meant they finally have the player they always wished Reggie Bush would be. His departure in San Diego has left them floundering. This will be close, the Falcons are no schmucks, but Brees will find a way.
The score: New Orleans 27 Atlanta 24
The Pick: New Orleans -0.5


Dwight Howard Tebowing

Buffalo Bills (5-3) at Dallas Cowboys (4-4) -5.5
The game: Just as Dallas didn't turn into Superstars by beating Seattle, the Bills didn't turn into Pumpkins by losing to the Jets. I expect this to be more in line with the air-tight Bills @ Giants encounter (24-27) a couple of weeks ago, than this long line suggests.
The score: Buffalo 27 Dallas 30
The Pick: Buffalo +5.5

Pittsburgh Steelers (6-3) at Cincinnati Bengals (6-2) +3.5
The game: So, is everyone aware The Bungles are on a five game winning streak? No, seriously. Look it up. A genuine five game winning streak, including quality wins over Tennessee and Buffalo. Let's repeat that, The Bungles are on a five game winning streak!! Meanwhile, the Steelers come into this with a day less to recover, dazed and confused after losing to the previously reasonably inept Ravens. The shock of the week, Just remember you heard it here first!
The score: Pittsburgh 20 Cincinnati 24
The Pick: Cincinnati +3.5


Tebowing is art

St. Louis Rams (1-7) at Cleveland Browns (3-5) -2.5
The game: Stephen Jackson says ''I beat the Saints on my own, naturally I can do same against the incredibly awful Brownies!'' In the last four games Jackson has churned out a sterling 455 yards on the ground. Also, Sam Bradford is back for the Rams. This may not even be close.
The score: St Louis 27 Cleveland 17
The Pick: St Louis +2.5

Denver Broncos (3-5) at Kansas City Chiefs (4-4) -3.5
The game: There's enough intelligent thinking going on over on the Kansas sideline to come up with something to confuse 'The Second Coming' (or whatever inane nickname eventually sticks for you know who). Kansas are on and off, but at home, against their bitter rivals, you can't see anything but max effort. Matt Cassel may not be a showboating, Tebowing, politicising media act, but, he generally gets the job done.
The score: Denver 20 Kansas 28
The Pick: Kansas -3.5


Tebowing at its finest

Tennessee Titans (4-4) at Carolina Panthers (2-6) -2.5
The game: A tough one to pick, however the Panthers only two wins are against Jacksonville and Washington (Washington post Hightower, I might add) - and thus a slight edge appears for the Titans who have a couple of quality wins including a stunner over the Ravens. Should be a tight one, but the Titans still have a chance in '11, and have the more veteran squad all round.
The score: Tennessee 24 Carolina 20
The Pick: Tennessee +2.5

Jacksonville Jaguars (2-6) at Indianapolis Colts (0-9) +2.5
The game: Goodness gracious. Well, Maurice Jones Drew trumps anything on the other side of the line of scrimmage. That's about all you can say about this one.
The score: Jacksonville 27 Indianapolis 20
The Pick: Jacksonville -2.5

Washington Redskins (3-5) at Miami Dolphins (1-7) -3.5
The game: Two teams going in opposite directions, fast. The temptation is to jump on Miami. Hang on a second. The 'Skins four losses in a row look bad at first sight, however, all four were to good or very good teams, Carolina, Philly, Buffalo and the 49ers. Miami have one win, total, and that was against the very up-and-down Chiefs. Let's not anoint the Dolphins just yet.
The score: Washington 23 Miami 21
The Pick: Washington +3.5

Arizona Cardinals (2-6) at Philadelphia Eagles (3-5) -13.5
The game: When was the last time a 3-5 team gave 13.5 points? The spread scares me, with the Eagles on a short week. And having, you know, just lost, and all.
The score: Arizona 17 Philadelphia 24
The Pick: Arizona +13.5


Tebowing for our freedoms

Houston Texans (6-3) at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-4) +3.5
The game: Tampa are fading fast, and are giving up too many yards on the ground. Houston comes into town featuring its running game, bad news for Tampa.
The score: Houston 30 Tampa 20
The Pick: Houston -3.5

Baltimore Ravens (6-2) at Seattle Seahawks (2-6) +7.5
The game: The only reason that line is so low is Seattle have a decent home crowd. Doesn't matter how vociferous they are, however, they are going to get stomped by a suddenly confident Ravens.
The score: Baltimore 30 Seattle 13
The Pick: Baltimore -7.5

Detroit Lions (6-2) at Chicago Bears (5-3) -2.5
The game: Just a hunch, and bear in mind, I respect the Bears, and believed they could beat the Eagles, but the ferocious Detroit D, with that aggressive, angry front seven, can take advantage of the Bears terrible, terrible offensive line. Jay Cutler could be in for a long day.
The score: Detroit 28 Chicago 24
The Pick: Detroit +2.5


Office Tebowing

New York Giants (6-2) at San Francisco 49ers (7-1) -3.5
The game: Beating Cleveland and Washington (As the 49ers have done) is not the same as beating New England and Buffalo (as the Giants have done). I would suggest this game is way more suited to the Giants, also. Way too many points.
The score: New York 28 San Francisco 24
The Pick: New York +3.5

New England Patriots (5-3) at New York Jets (5-3) -2
The game: Gut Check time for New England. Funny thing is, the Jets offence is not the type to scare New England, and the Patriots will be more than happy to slug it out in the trenches (rather than trying to defend the pass). Belichick and Brady are not suddenly turned to pumpkins after two tough losses to two tough teams. Not quite time to write the Patriots off.
The score: New England 28 New York Jets 26
The Pick: New England +2

Minnesota Vikings (2-6) at Green Bay Packers (8-0) -13.5
The game: It's a trap!! The Vikings, off a bye week and a big win the week before, well rested and ready, cruise into town to face a Packers team that yes, is winning, and winning easily, but to date they have beaten two teams by 14 points. The Vikings can stay in touch.
The score: Minnesota 24 Green Bay 30
The Pick: Minnesota +13.5



Office Tebowing II

Previous weeks
Week one - 11-4
Week two - 12-4
Week three - 6-10
Week four - 10-6
Week five - 7-6
Week six - 4-9
Week seven 6-7
Week eight - 7-6
Week nine - 5-9


Linkage

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Penn State affair: Massive failure all round, while ESPN still throws bouquets at Paterno


I am sorry, but let's just come out and ask it, why are the biggest sporting websites still talking about Joe Paterno in terms of adoration? Weeks after the allegations have sprung that Paterno and others turned a blind eye to a Penn State coach abusing young boys, hours after calls for Peterno's head started, ESPN amongst others are publishing soft-focus, slush pieces on the Penn State head-coach. Check out this rubbish from ESPN. You can almost hear the PGA Tour soft-core porn music humming in the background as you read the below.

''The love was evident as several hundred students crowded around Paterno's house - The 84-year-old coach looked happier than any senior citizen ever to have kids trample his lawn. He exited the passenger side of a white university van to thank the students in his driveway. A few minutes after that, he opened his front window to say a few more words as the crowd surged forward to hear him. And just when everybody was about to disperse some 30 minutes later, a grinning Paterno walked out the front door to address the students one more time.''
What? Seriously? Are we talking about the same guy here? Is this grinning, lovable old man the same guy who was Jerry Sandusky's boss in 1998 when that year, the Penn State police department conducted investigations of allegations that Sandusky had hugged, rubbed against and inappropriately touched two 11-year-old boys while they were naked with him in the Penn State locker room? During same investigations, and with police listening in, the mother of one of the boys called Sandusky to confront him. According to the grand jury report, Sandusky told her:
“I understand. I was wrong. I wish I could get forgiveness. I know I won’t get it from you. I wish I were dead.”
For whatever bizarre reason he got away with it, but that moment was Paterno's chance to get a clearly deranged man out of dealing with his kids. His kids. How does Paterno let this evil creature stay employed after that?

Back to the ESPN sludge from above, is that fuzzy piece of nostalgic vomit talking about the same Paterno that in 2002 completely ignored strong evidence that a young boy was raped by this evil scum-bag Sandusky in the locker room?

Just checking, you know, if we are all talking about the same Paterno that ESPN is still jamming a halo over.

These people at the high ranks of College and High School Football have a simple remit. Take care of young adults and children. Look after their safety, educate them and take care of their well being. Nothing else matters. Money doesn't matter, BCS ranking do not matter, Boosters do not matter, recruiting profile does not matter, absolutely nothing else matters. Or nothing else should matter.

Everyone involved in the NCAA Football program at Penn State should step down immediately, including the lovable' Joe Paterno, for they have failed at the most simple of tasks. Look after the kids.

The moment they decided they had 'done enough' back in 1998, they failed at their simple job. This was then exacerbated in 2002, when they yet again turned a blind eye and failed epically at their essential yet simple remit. It is worrying that Paterno hasn't already stepped aside. There is little doubt that evidence shows he is a decent, philanthropic and intelligent man. However, his later years will no doubt be wracked with the guilt of realising his gut wrenching mistake in not blowing this disgusting scandal up the moment he got wind of it.

The fact of the matter is, he will only have himself to blame. The split second he got a whiff of this, he should have blown the whole thing up.

Tough material to take to the grave, and plenty of questions remain.


Linkage

Friday, November 04, 2011

NFL picks: Week nine: If you read one NFL picks column this week....


Tough week ahead. When faced with a tough week, what better way to alleviate the tension than to incorporate some of the best and worst movie tag lines into your picks? Best read whilst imagining that deep gravelly voice of the guy that does the movie trailers.

Previous weeks
Running total - 63-52 ATS
Week by week links at foot of column

Essential NFL pick links

Atlanta Falcons (4-3) at Indianapolis Colts (0-8) +7.5
The game: Little Matty Ryan was having a down year. Then he met the Colts. From the makers of ‘My God we’re going to go 0-16’, this summer, if you see one team that will probably cover more easily than you expected, see the Falcons beat the demoralized Colts.
The score: Atlanta 34 Indianapolis 17
The Pick: Atlanta -7.5

New York Jets (4-3) at Buffalo Bills (5-2) -1.5
The game: Eddie Murphy breaks out the Klumps fat suits and spray paints them white to bring to life the incredible true story of the fat-mouth coach who spent his life vomiting out bland, moronic quotes about not kissing Superbowl rings, and then never actually wins one! Brought to you by the people who gave you ‘OH my God! This team is so over rated its stupid!’ and by the director who made ‘Buffalo, better than you think!’, don’t go anywhere this weekend if you don’t go to Buffalo -1.5. They will literally take your breath away (and the ball too, they love turn-overs).
The score: New York J 24 Buffalo 26
The Pick: Buffalo -1.5

Cleveland Browns (3-4) at Houston Texans (5-3) -10.5
The game: Some people in life take what they want. Others take what they can get. Others just sit around eating popcorn. If you are as confused by this inane tagline as we are, then you are probably thinking about the Houston Texans. What exactly is their story? Will they be playing evil super villains this week, or awesome, shiny super heroes?
The score: Cleveland 17 Houston 34
The Pick: Houston -10.5

Seattle Seahawks (2-5) at Dallas Cowboys (3-4) -12.5
The game: No mercy. No Shame. No sequel. (Poor Seattle! Angry Dallas gonna get medieval on their ass!)
The score: Seattle 13 Dallas 36
The Pick: Dallas -12.5

Miami Dolphins (0-7) at Kansas City Chiefs (4-3) -6.5
The game: They were dead. But they got better. Well actually, they didn’t. This summer, if you see two teams go 0-16, see the Dolphins and Colts.
The score: Miami 13 Kansas 27
The Pick: Kansas -6.5

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-3) at New Orleans Saints (5-3) -7.5
The game: Controversy, what controversy? Normal service resumed in New Orleans.
The score: Tampa 24 New Orleans 38
The Pick: New Orleans -7.5

San Francisco 49ers (6-1) at Washington Redskins (3-4) +3.5
The game: We've Sensed It. We've Seen The Signs. Now... It's Happening. The 49ers are actually good.
The score: San Fran 24 Washington 17
The Pick: San Fran -3.5

Cincinnati Bengals (5-2) at Tennessee Titans (4-3) -2.5
The game: Science created him, now Chuck Norris must destroy him. Or fix him, I mean. What on earth is up with Chris Johnson?
The score: Cincinnati 21 Tennessee 24
The Pick: Tennessee -2.5

Denver Broncos (2-5) at Oakland Raiders (4-3) -7.5
The game: Lose hard? Lose harder. This summer, if you see one team get absolutely pummeled by another that senses blood in the water, see the Broncos absolutely diabolical excuse for a team get ripped to shreds by the Raiders.
The score: Denver 20 Oakland 40
The Pick: Oakland -7.5

Green Bay Packers (7-0) at San Diego Chargers (4-3) +5.5
The game: Nobody said they could do it. Maybe they can’t. But they possibly could. And one thing in life is sure, that’s probably too many points to give a decent home dog.
The score: Green Bay 30 San Diego 27
The Pick: San Diego +5.5

St. Louis Rams (1-6) at Arizona Cardinals (1-6) -4.5
The game: The greatest story ever told! The greatest entertainment experience of a lifetime! The only thing more terrifying than the last minute of this game is the preceding 59!!
The score: St Louis 0 Arizona 6
The Pick: Arizona -4.5

New York Giants (5-2) at New England Patriots (5-2) -8.5
The game: Some memories are best forgotten. Like the time I woke up on a beach in Mexico after that Superbowl. Revenge. It’s a dish best served cold.
The score: New York G 27 New England 38
The Pick: New England -8.5



Baltimore Ravens (5-2) at Pittsburgh Steelers (6-2) -3.5
The game: The fastest hands in the East (Well, South) meets the biggest mouth in the West (Well, North)! The bout to knock the other guy out. The thrilla in Manilla. The rumble in the jungle. Be amazed as Ray Lewis turns easy tackles into circus acts! Be stunned as The Head and shoulders guy in the Pittsburgh secondary drops easy interceptions while he counts his hair care endorsement checks! If you see one game this weekend, this might, all sarcasm aside, be the one to see.
The score: Baltimore 17 Pittsburgh 32
The Pick: Pittsburgh -3.5

Chicago Bears (4-3) at Philadelphia Eagles (3-4) -6.5
The game: They have a plan. But not a clue. The movie about the Bears offensive plan, get it?
The score: Chicago 20 Philadelphia 34
The Pick: Philadelphia -6.5

Previous weeks
Week one - 11-4
Week two - 12-4
Week three - 6-10
Week four - 10-6
Week five - 7-6
Week six - 4-9
Week seven 6-7
Week eight - 7-6

Linkage